 | | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This... —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) Sorry if I haven't been clear. I don't have any expectation that the market will provide me whatever I fancy, in this market or any other. What my expectation is, though, is that for it to be a free market, there cannot be unreasonable (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This... —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) I'm still not getting where you are going with this, Larry. Free market of governments? What in the world does that have to do with inheritable contracts as a system of stable (or coercive) government? Unreasonable coercive barriers to entry (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This... —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) This subthread got a start when someone said "if you don't like it (that you inherited a contract), vote with your feet". Perfectly valid statement. What I was trying to point out was that it is not a perfect solution. Life isn't perfect, of (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This... —David Koudys
| | | | | (...) News Flash--nothing is perfect. Not to bring religion into it, but we live in a fallen world. Beyond the religions scope, Democracy is the 'lesser of all evils". Heck, you and I don't even live in a pure democratic society, and basically used (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
