Subject:
|
Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:48:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1162 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> > The problem is there's no free market in governmental systems at the moment,
> > and the present players collude to keep it that way.
>
> I would surmise that "Fre Market" and "Governmental Systems" are exclusive.
> There has to be oversight to "Free Market" in order to maintain the safety
> and health of those involved in the Free Market system--hence Gov't.
If it is being tampered with, then it isn't free. Or is that what you meant?
> I live in a reasonably safe house. Why? Because there are rules stating
> that my house has to adhere to specific codes. These codes are enforced,
> ultimately, by gov't agencies.
Building codes also prevent a wide array of construction techniques that are
cheaper and safer because the building industry is entrenched in the code
setting aparatus. So when an industry is using the law to maintain a
suffocating monopoly on their market, and it is being sold to the public as a
safety and property value maintenance scheme, is that really such a good thing?
I challenge you to build a cob home in any city in your country or mine that
has a population of over 100,000!
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
