Debate : 19672


Off-Topic / Debate / 19672	19671 \| 19673

Subject:	Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:48:27 GMT
Viewed:	490 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Spencer Nowak writes: > > > So, I wonder why you require "hard" evidence for one side of the coin, but > > such amazingly soft (ie clearly fabricated) evidence for the other. > > Yes, because a UN weapons inspector says something, that makes it true. > That's the same bunch that includes members who tipped off the Iraqis that > inspections were about to happen so that they could shift stuff around. > > > I could say the same... > > why do we need "hard evidence" to go to war(which, by the way, we have given > > Saddam ample chances to avoid by simply telling us what he has) and "soft > > evidence" to stay home and let a US hating dictator get wmds? > > You know, for someone who said "I Have No Intention of Debating Any of > This...", he sure is talking a lot... but he's right, he's not debating, > he's just repeating "this war is about oil" over and over in hopes that > eventually everyone believes it. > > This war isn't about oil. The Bush crowd doesn't think that big. There is no > Grand Conspiracy to Take Over the World, starting with our civil liberties. > That's not the way it works. This war is about stupidity and not thinking > through what Jefferson said. This is Death by a Thousand Cuts. > > And those who go around ranting about Halliburton, Enron and Grand > Conspiracies actually do those working for freedom a disservice, because > they look so foolish doing so <...snip...> Thank you for saying so! I have about had it with RM's silly conspiratorial blathering. JOHN

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) Well, you're welcome, but I wish you would have left at least one more sentence of what I posted, the very next one in fact: "Ashcroft (and his bunch) actually ARE out there undermining liberty" This is true, you can't argue it, so maybe (...) (21 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) Yes, because a UN weapons inspector says something, that makes it true. That's the same bunch that includes members who tipped off the Iraqis that inspections were about to happen so that they could shift stuff around. (...) You know, for (...) (21 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search