Subject:
|
no D-Day in '44? [was Re: Not in my name!]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:16:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
104 times
|
| |
|
|
> I don't always agree with Churchill, who supposedly once said "if
> Hitler invaded hell, I would find something favorable to say about the
> devil"... I very well might have left the USSR to its own devices during WW II.
Churchill did say that the USSR "tore the guts out of the Nazi war machine".
The USSR lost ~25-30,000,000 in WW2 [the USA lost ~140k in Europe]. Without
the USSR, D-Day would never have happened in '44 as Germany would have had its
best divisions on the “Atlantic Wall” [rather than kids & old men alongside
Czech & Polish conscripts]. With no D-Day in '44, Berlin would have been
subjected to a nuclear attack in '45.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Not in my name!
|
| (URL) that the LP has evinced some support for the antiwar movement, including some activists marching in some of the same demonstrations that this writer has profiled. (see also: (URL) sure I agree with the LP stance here. While I oppose the coming (...) (22 years ago, 27-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
