 | | Re: Future Speech Text of George W. Bush? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) Whoa! That changes my answer, too. When I read it I thought it was for action against Milosovic, which I've also heard as a point of comparison to the present Bush frenzy. My assessment of the difference between the Milosovic ouster and the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Future Speech Text of George W. Bush? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) And I may add that there are two entirely different scenarios here--Blix hasn't once said that he was at an empasse. Sure there has been 'slow down' but he hasn't given up on the inspection process. Further, Clinton didn't invade Iraq with (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Future Speech Text of George W. Bush? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) No, the situation is exactly the same. But we have the benefit of hindsight to see that Saddam was just jerking the UN inspections off during the Clinton Adminstration. And Clinton acted, and rightly so. (...) Brace yourself for his report (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Future Speech Text of George W. Bush? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Glad to hear it, because I read your post 3 times trying to make sense of it and giving you the benefit of the doubt:-) Basically, Clinton was in the same situation Bush is in now-- facing Saddam's non-compliance with UN resolutions. Clinton (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
