 | | Ture Capitalism and Property Rights (was Re: People are idiots...) —Richie Dulin
|
| | | (...) Could you explain what you mean by 'all rights are property rights'? (...) Why? (Is it purely so capitalism will work?) (...) No respect for rights = socialism Respect for rights = capitalism ? No. If all rights are property rights then: (...) (22 years ago, 8-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Ture Capitalism and Property Rights (was Re: People are idiots...) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Sure... (URL) 118 (1998) is the first place I think I use that phrase in this forum. (22 years ago, 8-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Pure Capitalism and Property Rights (was Re: People are idiots...) —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | (...) Lots of interesting stuff there. Plenty of examples demonstrating that specific rights can be construed as property rights, but apparently nothing demonstrating it to be the case for all rights (but I could have missed it - there are, after (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Pure Capitalism and Property Rights (was Re: People are idiots...) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Dunno. I haven't found one yet that wasn't. (Meaning either a putative right is a property right, or it isn't a right) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
