 | | Re: Leaks (was Re: Here's one of the many things I don't understand... —David Koudys
|
| | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes: <snip> (...) In my honest opinion--no--which is sad. But any force that invades Iraq should be under a mandate by a united coalition, not by the US. My prayers, however, are for peace. Dave K (22 years ago, 6-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Leaks (was Re: Here's one of the many things I don't understand... —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) Okay, I was just trying to force a reality check. Perhaps there is some other avenue open rather than war. (...) I don't see why it would be to the United States' advantage to have it any other way. This threatened unilateral action is a load (...) (22 years ago, 6-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Leaks (was Re: Here's one of the many things I don't understand... —David Koudys
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes: <snip> (...) Oooh, pistols at 10 paces! That'd be great. Maybe jousting--Bush in a suit of armour would be an interesting picture. Possible way of resolving all future issues--let the leaders (...) (22 years ago, 6-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
