To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18774
18773  |  18775
Subject: 
Re: Is this ammunition against Sex Offender Registration?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:34:06 GMT
Viewed: 
466 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
Is this ammunition against sex offender registration?

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Southwest/01/16/sex.offender.ap/index.html

Will law enforcement step up to protect this man's rights?

It's these sort of actions that force these [mainly] guys underground and to
coalesce. If society believes that these offenders can return to the community,
then I think we should try to rehabilitate them rather than make them social
pariahs. However, I've all but given up expecting rational thought on this
issue when all we seem to get in the UK is tabloid scare-mongering and public
hysteria.

The reality is that Children are most at risk from those they live with
[especially the dominant male of house] and not "strangers".

The UK does not publicly name sex offenders [instead they are asked to register
with police and are subject to “home” visits]. Recently a tabloid tried to
start naming sex offenders in response to a high profile child
abduction/murder. The result was that a few offenders were reported to have
been forced underground and lost contact with the police. The low point of that
episode was when a small mob mistook a “paediatrician” for a “paedophile” and
attacked her house - which pretty much sums up the level of the debate!

More here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1709708.stm


On a related note about “naming & shaming”, I’m not sure what to make of this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2691013.stm

Scott A




I'm not saying that some people may not continue to be dangerous. I'm
not saying that this individual will continue to be dangerous. We are
supposedly ruled by law and the constitution, and law and the
constitution suggest that vigilante justice is not right.

Note that I am glad to see that the police did in fact arrest the man
who punched this individual. I wonder if he will actually be convicted
of anything though?

Frank



Message is in Reply To:
  Is this ammunition against Sex Offender Registration?
 
Is this ammunition against sex offender registration? (URL) law enforcement step up to protect this man's rights? I'm not saying that some people may not continue to be dangerous. I'm not saying that this individual will continue to be dangerous. We (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR