Subject:
|
Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:48:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2005 times
|
| |
|
|
First off please see my email to you on the subject. Secondly let me say I
agree with you and think you have put many things in a better way then myself.
>
> > > > This was the Second Covenant and it still holds today.
> > >
> > > *What* is the Second Covenant?
> >
> > Ask Jesus to be your savior and forgive your sins. And he will. Thus
> > allowing you access to God.
>
> Believe, repent, be baptised in the name of Jesus Christ (Father Son and
> Holy Ghost are titles not a name, there is one name under heaven whereby we
> must be saved, not three) and ye shall recieve the gift of the Holy Ghost
> (God's spirit in you). That is the start of the second covenant. After it
> is started there is much more that will happen. Too much to get into. This
> is the "new birth".
A nice concise statement... Couldn't have put it better myself.
SNIP
>
> Jesus died so that sins "would" be forgiven. Not are. A covenant is
> conditional by both parties involved not just one.
Yes, this is an example of who God died for not the conditions od the
actual event.
SNIP
> Repentance is for forgiveness, baptism is for washing them away. Think like
> this- playing in the mud in school clothes as a child. Mom, was not happy
> but you said you sorry and that you wouldn't do it again. She forgives you
> (repentance). Then she washes your clothes and sends you to the tub
> (baptism). After the initial new birth (see above) it is by calling on
> Jesus and claiming the blood He shed that will wash away new sins.
Again well put.
SNIP
>
> The very fact there were eight people on an ark thousands of years ago
> should say something. Hypothetical- if you were god and made many wonderful
> and beautiful things and creatures. And then you made one with
> characteristics like unto your own. Then, it disobeys you who gave it it's
> very life is that not reason enough to destroy it and start over? Therefore
> God must love mankind if after all we've done and we are still around.
I have to agree.
SNIP
>
> I doubt if you will read this and I doubt if I will try to find my way back.
> If you (meaning Brendan or Nathan) would like to talk let me know via email.
I'll take this invitation. I think we mean the same this just wasn't a
good post to take my views from.
> Nathan go to top view search and look under general I believe. • Ahhhh!
> God is bigger than anyone will fully understand but simple enough that you
> can know Him.
Nicely PUT!!!
>
> -Dan
Thanks Dan
God Bless (Dan!)
Nathan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
| (...) These points aren't entirely correct and without going into a full bible study I will write what I have found to be true The points 1-3. God is not like unto a plant, you ought to look at Him more like this- God the invisible spirit who is the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
205 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
