|
|
 | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
|
| (...) What part of this is becoming a Monty Python routine didn't you understand? The automatic gainsaying of whatever the other person said isn't an argument. You offer no support for your statements, while you leave support for mine right there (I (...) (23 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
|
| (...) I am. Didn't you get the memo? Dave! (23 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
|
| (...) That's actually my stance as well, but I didn't all my facts straight before posting, so I figured I'd simply address the logical problems of Mike's assertion. Michael Moore, who admittedly sometimes clings too dearly to erroneous information, (...) (23 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
|
| (...) Okay, so it's redundant. I just like the tongue-twister aspects, as Larry noted. :-) Bruce (23 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: I point out that Scott meets everything with a new attack, and he proves me right yet again
|
| (...) Hey, Ill submit to judgment by my peers. Maybe we should run a "Who is the most self-righteous" poll? ;-) Bruce (23 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
