Debate : 17810


Off-Topic / Debate / 17810	17809 \| 17811

Subject:	*Re: For Those That Don't Get* the 2nd Amendement (was Re: Those stupid liberal)**
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Wed, 25 Sep 2002 04:32:06 GMT
Viewed:	1572 times

> Not even close. You know my point about the police and armed services--I > shan't delve into them, again, to refute this faulty notion of yours. Speaking of faulty notions... Name me one country, past or present, where ONLY the police and armed services were allowed to have guns, that is NOT a dictatorship. -Mike Petrucelli

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: For Those That Don't Get the 2nd Amendement (was Re: Those stupid liberal)
(...) In fairness, England must be damned close to total gun control. I know it's not total but lack the details -- perhaps Scott or someone else can supply further details. While seeing what google would cough up on it, I found this: (URL) is from (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: For Those That Don't Get the 2nd Amendement (was Re: Those stupid liberal)
(...) Well, you could choose to call my opinion 'trolling', however, I know I'm not. (...) And in each and every instance you quoted, I looked at the entire quote, and found that I read it differntly than you. I pointed out it should be interpreted, (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search