To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17761
17760  |  17762
Subject: 
Re: Those stupid conservative (was liberal) judges are at it again!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:51:19 GMT
Viewed: 
4644 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richie Dulin writes:
> > 
> > > > But that's it! If you're eligible for citizenship, you're eligible to (nay,
> > > > you have a duty to...) own a gun.
> > > 
> > > ...and do you therefore also have a duty to be part of a well regulated
> > militia?
> > 
> > Well, I think the duty part is Larry's opinion.  One that I vaguely
> > share, but I certainly wouldn't hold people to.
> 
> Me either. Duty needs to be taken on voluntarily. It may get you extra
> privs, but it shouldn't be forced.
> 
> > It's just that we think more highly of people who fully participate
> > in the way of American governance.  There are lots of people who scam out
> > of jury duty, ignore their chance to vote, fail to stay armed and practiced,
> > etc.  Those people are not being fully involved in holding
> > the reigns
> 
> (reins... a reign is just exactly what we want to prevent! :-) all hail
> Emperor George II and his visier, Dick )
> 
> > of their country and seeing that a government of the people, by the
> > people, and for the people is actually doing good stuff.
> 
> Snipped the militia part because I agree... and so I could mention the
> following which is tangential.
> 
> Paraphrasing (including quotes) from the Grand Rapids Press of Thu and Fri
> last: On Thu it came to light that a local judge had sentenced a juror to 24
> hours of community service for the following:
> 
> She was empaneled as a potential juror, and when the prosecutor asked her
> "can you weigh the testimony of police officers fairly, giving them equal
> weight with that of other witnesses" she said "no, I cannot because the
> police recently refused to respond to an incident at the laundromat I
> manage... a woman in the parking lot was being disruptive, asked to leave,
> and struck an employee of mine with a broomstick repeatedly. The police
> would not respond. For that reason I harbor some resentment and don't think
> I can fairly weigh their testimony".
> 
> She was excused.
> 
> Empaneled again, before same judge, asked same question, gave same answer.
> Judge lost it. Said "you are polluting the pool with your opinions, why
> should 40 other potential jurors hear this, you have to do something else
> other than be a juror, so you have to do 24 hours of community service,
> report to the community service officer"... who gave her 3 consecutive
> mondays picking up litter on a group with convicted felons.
> 
> At this point I lost it too, because here's a woman who gave an honest
> answer and got punished. It's *allowed* to be resentful or to be annoyed at
> the police, we don't have a constitutional requirement to be Shiny Happy
> People, after all. (yet?)
> 
> Myself I might have pursued action against the police rather than just being
> resentful, but hey, we are from different strata, I have friends who are
> lawyers.
> 
> Fortunately there is a happy ending. When the appellate court got wind of
> this, they issued a rather strongly worded statement that judges do not get
> to manufacture law and impose penalties and that this judge had better knock
> it off.
> 
> Judge backpedaled, saying that he was suggesting that she "volunteer" rather
> than that he "sentenced her", which is not borne out by the testimony of
> others or of her.
> 
> Her final comment is rather telling: "Well, now I harbor resentment against
> the judicial system as well as against the police" or words to that effect.

My dad got called in for jury duty--first question--"Mr Koudys, what's your
take on capital punishment?"

My dad said "Hang the b***ard"

"Thank you Mr. Koudys, you may go home now..."

I got a letter saying that I had to fill out a form to be put in the queue
for jury duty.  I filled out the form, and I wrote an additional letter,
stating to the effect that I was in a semester taking one of my poli sci
courses, and that I was excited to be part of the process of our system that
I was learning about, that I was eager to do the best I could for my fellow
citizen and my country, blah blah blah... I was quite sincere at the time.
I sent off the form and letter and never got the call.

Oh well.

Dave K.



Message is in Reply To:
  Those stupid conservative (was liberal) judges are at it again!
 
(...) Me either. Duty needs to be taken on voluntarily. It may get you extra privs, but it shouldn't be forced. (...) (reins... a reign is just exactly what we want to prevent! :-) all hail Emperor George II and his visier, Dick ) (...) Snipped the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR