Subject:
|
Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Sep 2002 06:12:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1369 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> > I don't care if you own a gun--it comes with a free society. But don't
> > think it comes from the 2nd. Here's the point: The 2nd says "In order to
> > maintian a well regulated militia, people have the right to bear arms."
> > (whatever, is close)
>
> No, not close, in fact completely wrong. The 2nd says "A well regulated
> militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the
> people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
>
> [snip]
> > You cannot have it both ways--you cannot uphold the ideals of democracy and
> > say at the same time, 'if they don't listen to me I will shoot them' for
> > that's *not* democracy, that's tyranny.
>
> If you bother to read...
> http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=17657
>
> The point of the second amendment is to allow the people to overthrow the
> government when it becomes tyrannical and REINSTATE the republic.
It says "the security of a free state", not "the maintaining of a free state
from internal tyrants" or even "securing a free state". It's a long reach
to place your interpretation on the law as written.
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
