 | | Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | (...) It would probablly benefit the Iraqi people a great deal. Personally I would have expected the United Nations to get rid of Sadam 2 years ago when he had about 12,000 Kurds (an ethnic miniority in Iraq) murdered in gas chambers. (...) Oh sure (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) This is news to me. Do you have a reference? Scott A (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) Ok I mixed up Iraq's gassing of Kurds in the late 80s with Turkey bombing Kurds in Iraq about 2 years ago. Either way the Dictator should go. Do I think Bush Jr. is going about it in the proper way. Heck No! But even Bush Jr.'s self-serving (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) interest (...) would (...) Kurds (...) (URL) Gee Brain I forgot the link. -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | blair's dossier (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) ... and Blair has just published his "dossier": (URL) A (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: blair's dossier (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) This is the correct link: (URL) A (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
