Subject:
|
Poll tax! (was: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Sep 2002 04:50:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1026 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
(snipped)
> I'm an atheist. Were it up to me and were I in a less charitable frame of
> mind than I usually am, the constitution would say that those of you out
> there that hold irrational beliefs (such as christianity, socialism, and
> other such counterfactuals), and therefore are less productive members of
> society, are not the same class of citizen as those of us that are fully
> rational, and would have to pay higher poll taxes to vote than I would.
!
You have to pay a tax TO VOTE???!!! :-O
Or did I misinterpret?
> But it doesn't. It makes no such distinction. Fortunately for you and J2.
>
> Hopefully that clears things up. You're relatively new here in this section
> so you'll forgive me if I am somewhat bored by most of this and give rather
> terse answers initially, as it's all well plowed ground.
Pedro
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
| (...) Or suppress it either. Allowing a club to meet isn't support, but preventing one from meeting is suppression. Unless the school has a policy forbidding all clubs from meeting on school grounds it cannot prevent some clubs (which are otherwise (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
