 | | Overview of Changes to Legal Rights —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (URL) particularly heartening. (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Overview of Changes to Legal Rights —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | (...) I am curious as to how far along that bill is. I would find it very hard to believe that Congress would pass that. Even if they did, I would find it extremely hard to believe that the Supreme Court would NOT rule it unconstitutional. Blatant (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Overview of Changes to Legal Rights —Kyle Henneberque
|
| | | | | | (...) Actually, as soon as it gets passed, the Supreme Court couldn't rule it unconstitutional. They can't do that until it is an issue in a case they hear. We would have to wait for somebody to be arrested via a law enacted by that bill. Then they (...) (22 years ago, 12-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Overview of Changes to Legal Rights —William R. Ward
|
| | | | (...) For those of you who, like me, had trouble copying and pasting this link: (URL) William R Ward bill@wards.net (URL) Verbing weirds language. --Calvin (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
