Debate : 17504


Off-Topic / Debate / 17504	17503 \| 17505

Subject:	Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:09:47 GMT
Viewed:	691 times

"John" <John@TCLTC.org> writes: > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: > > http://fyi.cnn.com/2002/fyi/teachers.ednews/09/10/bible.club.ap/index.html > > > > Is this the same 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals that recently ruled > > unconstitutional the phrase "under God" in the Congressionally-endorsed > > Pledge of Allegiance? > > When you adequately explain from where our government claims our rights > originate, then we can talk about the constitutionality of "God language". The Founding Fathers were deists, not theists. They believed in a Creator, not the xian god. --Bill. -- William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Verbing weirds language. --Calvin

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
(...) I never suggested otherwise. They acknowledged the existence of God without necessarily endorsing a particular brand of religion's understanding of Him. -John (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
(...) When you adequately explain from where our government claims our rights originate, then we can talk about the constitutionality of "God language". -John (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search