| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> Just for the sake of argument, let's assume something like the soul and the
> body co-exist. Why deny the body and favor the soul? This kind of duality
> is something I find very peculiar. Who says the body and soul are
> separable? Maybe the body and soul are indivisible. Why not valorize both
> the body and the soul together? Couldn't the things that make the flesh
> happy also make the soul happy, simultaneously? Just a thought...
The only comment I'll make here is that the soul is generally defined to be
a part of humanity which *can* be separated from the body at death, so I
think this is not a logical assumption. But I see no reason why things that
make the flesh happy can't also make the soul happy (assuming you believe in
the existence of soul...) or vice versa.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: slight
|
| (...) I have to admit I almost snorted milk out my nose reading this "deep programming" and "childhood trauma" bit. Too much! =) But, if I may say so, it is no more obnoxious to express derision or condescension for John's views than it is for him (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
225 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
