Subject:
|
Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:30:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5876 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> So regarding events prior to the Big Bang, all we have are opinions which may
> or may not be based upon religion. To say that a Creator started it all or to
> say that it all just happened are equally neutral. Would that be a fair
> assessment?
I'd say you're accurate-- both statements are (AFIAK) equally valid. Which
is precicely why "science" says neither of them, but instead says "I dunno,
I won't commit to either option"
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) Am I *that* transparent? :-) So regarding events prior to the Big Bang, all we have are opinions which may or may not be based upon religion. To say that a Creator started it all or to say that it all just happened are equally neutral. Would (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
395 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
