Subject:
|
Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:14:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5624 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> To say that a Creator started it all or to say that it all just happened are
> equally neutral. Would that be a fair assessment?
No, not actually.
Scenario 1: a creator and the kernel of the universe (2 elements)
Scenario 2: the kernel of the universe itself (1 element)
All things being otherwise equal, I would tend to choose the scenario with
the fewest assertions. The concept of some kind of prime mover is merely an
admission of something totally unknown and of which we are able to gather no
or very little data. That's all.
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) Am I *that* transparent? :-) So regarding events prior to the Big Bang, all we have are opinions which may or may not be based upon religion. To say that a Creator started it all or to say that it all just happened are equally neutral. Would (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
395 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
