To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17081
17080  |  17082
Subject: 
Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:20:46 GMT
Viewed: 
5427 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
And don't make the mistake of saying that evolution is science.  Science is
based on what can be shown today--evolution happened a long time ago.

<...>

And don't try to teach evolution as science.  Science, either biology,
chemistry, and physics in high school, doesn't have to have *either* theory
taught at all for the children to succeed in these classes.  My
understanding of a weight falling 9.8 m/s^2 doesn't need either theory.
Saying that 2H2 + O2 = H20 + energy certainly doesn't need it, and the
concept of photosynthesis certainly doesn't need either.  High school is no
place for either of these theories to be taught.

<...>

It is my opinion, true.  Just as it is my opinion that evolution has less to
do with science as it does in forcing a theory of why God doesn't exist on
the public masses.

Dave, I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding about what
evolutionary theory is.  I would encourage you to step back from the
evolution:creation debate, and try and look at the theory of evolution from
within a scientific framework.  The theory of evolution has nothing
whatsoever to do with the presence or absence of God (or god or gods or
Yggdrasil's), and if it has been shown to you thusly, it's been misrepresented.

thanks,

James

Now this is refreshing--'The theory of Evolution' and saying that it has
nothing to do with the plausibility of God.

To clear up after reading my post and realizing that I didn't complete this
thought--I was thanking James for his well worded response.  It was shown to
me thusly (trashing God) in parts of this debate and I appreciate his
efforts to clear it up.

<snip>

Dave



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
 
(...) Now this is refreshing--'The theory of Evolution' and saying that it has nothing to do with the plausibility of God. For the record, I believe the world to be millions of years old. I believe the universe to be even older. I believe that there (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

395 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR