 | | Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | (...) Only because I am finishing my breakfast and only because it is the day it is... I do have a problem with patriotism. It is the same problem I have with most "religious" people and their seemingly mad fervor for whatever thing they happen to (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Little judgmental this morning, are we? To follow something blindly -- uneducated and (...) What's ignorant here is your elitism and your hatred. I thought lefties were supposed to be the tolerant ones... -- is really to favor a kind of (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes: [snip] (...) Wow! Do you really think this?: (...) What is the value of just getting together and patting one another on the back for being American? Chris (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I would (regrettably...) dispute that these traits are confined to (modern) liberals. In my own county you need look no further than the local GOP machine to find them, although the loyal Democratic opposition has them as well. Perhaps not as (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. —Thomas Stangl
|
| | | | Congratulations, John. In your responses below you have proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you cannot read anything over 1-2 sentences long and comprehend it. That, or that you simply refuse to comprehend it (which you proved with your last (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
