To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16824
16823  |  16825
Subject: 
Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 18:58:43 GMT
Viewed: 
3369 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

You would be well served not to use "West Wing" as your basis for research,
or even for sound bites. It's terribly biased in the statist/socialist
direction

  I've never watched the show, but I'm given to wonder if the people to whom
it's marketed are themselves disposed to the sort of government depicted on
the small screen.  I'm loathe to use the term "statist" since it's become
something of a hot-button word, but I'm curious whether the writers are just
writing what the viewership wants to hear.  And why not?  It's
entertainment, after all (except to Canadians, apparently!) 8^)

and the writers are quite skillful at twisting things to their own
ends, as they have happily admitted.

  And it's important for our neighbors to the North to recall that the show
is Fiction, and we shouldn't base national policy on that show any more than
we base the space program on Star Trek (but maybe we should re-work national
lifeguard policy based on TV.  Hmm...)

Think for yourself.

  Now you're just talking crazy.

A law preventing cream in coffee is indeed unconstitutional, as are about
98% of the rest of the laws we have nowadays. The mere fact that courts
don't find that way doesn't mean that it isn't unconstitutional, just that
the constitution has been mostly abrogated.

  This point has come up before in other forms, but there's something that's
always messed me up.  I thought (but am happy to be corrected) that the
Supreme Court has Constitutionally-granted authority to judge the
Constitionality of laws.  Am I wrong in this?

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
(...) I believe the word you're looking for is 'idealism' (...) And I think it's important for our neighbours to the south to recall that we Canadians play the best Americans on T.V. I can;t speak for the ROC, but I know that I like my entertainment (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes: <snip> You would be well served not to use "West Wing" as your basis for research, or even for sound bites. It's terribly biased in the statist/socialist direction and the writers are quite skillful (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

395 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR