 | | Re: Poor Target.... —David Eaton
|
| | | (...) Actually, I misspoke, but I'm not sure that's entirely your grievance with my post anyway. Rephrase above to "My guess is they're *also* mad at him..." Not to imply that people aren't mad for other reasons, which I think they are. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) I agree with you--if I'm writing a novel, I can "conceive" of any number of ways to commit fraud or theft or murder, but in itself that's no wrongdoing. Though I suppose that, if I commit any of those acts, my pre-planning might incriminate (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —Joseph Williams
|
| | | | | (...) Congratulations to everyone concerned in regards to their congnitive deducing skills. I had to read half the thread before I had fully figured out what Matt had done and some had already flamed him in the first few posts!! Not much to add here (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —Matt Sekerak
|
| | | | | | I love you guys. Well, it's been real...back to work. But first I gotta go return my Gunship at KayBee! Just kidding =) I feel good today, hope everyone else does, too. -Matt . (23 years ago, 25-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) But it could be illegal just publishing the novel. Just look at the DVD CCA / MPAA case against DeCSS. ROSCO (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
