 | | Re: A small rant on an unrelated issue —Mike Petrucelli
| | | | [snip] (...) Well it can be proven that Bruce is innocent of the charge. While there is no proof that a *insert magic cure of your choice* works, there is also no proof that it does NOT work. I agree that it is a stupid technicallity but that is the (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: A small rant on an unrelated issue —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) I'll need to see that evidence before I can believe you, and it would need to be pretty convincing! 8^) (...) Yeah, that does stink. I think, though, that tests for validity *do* exist, such that an alleged (IE: Fraudulent) "psychic" could (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: A small rant on an unrelated issue —Mike Petrucelli
| | | | | (...) LOL :-) -Mike Petrucelli (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
