To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 15578
15577  |  15579
Subject: 
Re: An armed society...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:00:15 GMT
Viewed: 
1512 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kirby Warden writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kirby Warden writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

<snip>

What if a society is mature enough to decide that guns have no place in the
community? Is that society no longer "free"?

Scott A

Of course they're still free... until someone comes and takes that freedom
away.  Then those "free" people might wish they had the means to keep that
freedom.

Strange that you view that as an eventuality rather than a possibility.

Yes, it is an eventuality.  History repeats itself.  Slavery in America
would have been far different (and purhaps nonexistent) had the Africans
been armed.

Nonsense.

The Jews may have avoided the Holocaust.  An entire nation may
not have been forced to build the pyramids.  History shows that an unarmed
society is prone to enslavement.  It matters not the technology level.

What about the native americans, were they not armed?


I
prefer life in a society where we are able to take the decision to live
largely without guns.

Where *you* have the decision or the government?

Not me personally. The community I live in.


Earlier, somebody said they needed a gun for
protection from the big bad government and his neighbours. That does not
sound like freedom to me – it sounds like the exact opposite.

It is *insurance*.  Without an armed society to *assist* its government in
the making of its laws, then the skies the limit as to how far the govenment
goes.

Democracy is the limit. In the UK governments have fallen due to protests,
not armed rebellion.

When will the USA have its next schoolyard massacre?


I prefer to
keep Lego under my bed – not a gun. How about you? ;)

Scott A

If push comes to shove, I'll take the gun.  Those LEGO bricks are NOT going
to keep me free.

They well help keep you mind free. I read they other day that that is not
all that easy in the USA:
Heaven help the American misfit
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4335425,00.html

Scott A



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: An armed society...
 
(...) Here you are being a fool. The Native Americans were lulled into a trust with the colonies. As time wore on, they began to depend on European lifestlyes, including hunting with rifles. Later as conflict grew, their population was largely (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: An armed society...
 
(...) Does Charles the First count as a fallen government and parliment as an armed rebellion? :-) Was America part of the UK and did the UK government (locally) fall because of the rebellion or was it never in power? Bruce (not being particularly (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: An armed society...
 
(...) <snip> (...) Yes, it is an eventuality. History repeats itself. Slavery in America would have been far different (and purhaps nonexistent) had the Africans been armed. The Jews may have avoided the Holocaust. An entire nation may not have been (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

179 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR