 | | Re: An armed society... —Christopher L. Weeks
| | | | (...) Court rules that the right to keep and bear arms is specifically guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution." What does that mean? It seems self-evident and not something on which the court would need to rule. So I assume it means something more. (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: An armed society... —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) Ah, the dangers of abridged source material. I found a more extensive discussion of that case at: (URL) appears that the case involved due process and the right to use one's property (in this case, residence) as one sees fit, as is spelled out (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: An armed society... —Richard Marchetti
| | | | | (...) You are noting the difference between the "holding" in a decision, and what is termed "obiter dictum." ob·i·ter dic·tum, pl. ob·i·ter dic·ta. 1. an incidental or passing remark, opinion, etc. 2. Law. an incidental or supplementary opinion by a (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
