Subject:
|
Re: An armed society...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:24:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2002 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > It is covered in detail here:
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_1566000/1566715.stm
> >
> > ==+==
> > The country has a population of six million, but there are estimated to be
> > at least two million publicly-owned firearms, including about 600,000
> > automatic rifles and 500,000 pistols.
> >
> > This is in a very large part due to Switzerland's unique system of national
> > defence, developed over the centuries.
> >
> > Instead of a standing, full-time army, the country requires every man to
> > undergo some form of military training for a few days or weeks a year
> > throughout most of their lives.
> >
> > Between the ages of 21 and 32 men serve as frontline troops. They are given
> > an M-57 assault rifle and 24 rounds of ammunition which they are required to
> > keep at home.
> >
> > Once discharged, men serve in the Swiss equivalent of the US National Guard,
> > but still have to train occasionally and are given bolt rifles. Women do not
> > have to own firearms, but are encouraged to.
> > ==+==
> >
> > But it is not perfect:
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_1566000/1566321.stm
>
> Scott, thanks for the link and summary. But I hope that perfect isn't the only
> way we can consider a system a success.
The system is not to my liking on a number of levels... but I am no fan of
national service.
I wonder if the Swiss navy uses the same system? ;)
Scott A
>
> Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
179 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
