| | constructive posts Scott Arthur
|
| | (...) I doubt I said "always"? I would also suggest you read the context to my comment, where KW was able to show a little humility in his response: (URL) we agree that hypocrites chastising people for writing Lego rather than LEGO(r) would (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: constructive posts Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Written in .debate: "when I post outside this group I try to be 100% constructive. I have to be..." You didn't use the word always, you used 100%. And, to be fair, you said you try. So are you asserting that this was constructive or that you (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: constructive posts Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I would assert that I made that clear in my last post to you? (...) I would agree that it would not be constructive if I were to bait Larry. Read the thread again and think about who is doing the baiting. (...) These "remember to dot your eyes (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |