Subject:
|
Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Jul 1999 21:45:33 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera./Spamless/com
|
Viewed:
|
1323 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote:
> Assuming we step into Libertopia, and you and Ed shack up, the
> government ought to treat you no differently than anyone else, right?
> He can inherit your property when you die, etc.
>
> What about corporations? Does ACME Insurance company have to let you
> guys on the family plan together or are they free, assuming they do
> not approve of homosexual marriages, to require you to hold separate
> single policies. Or are they free to charge you a higher premium for
> whatever reason?
Free to discriminate however they choose, for any reason or no reason at
all. They're not the government. The government, having a de jure
monopoly on the initiation of the use of force, is not free to
discriminate in any way shape or form.
> > Again, unfettered democracy is tyranny. Restricting a preexisting
> > business, a property owner, or a person from carrying out business of
> > any sort not otherwise rights violating at whatever time of day or night
> > is convenient for them to do so violates the takings clause of the
> > constitution, which was put there for a reason by the founding fathers.
>
> Hrmmm. What about community standards for how a building should be
> built, which colors can be used, type and size of signs, etc? I've
> seen some pretty unusual looking Wal-Marts, and I assume they look
> that way because of some sort of local "look and feel" code of some
> kind. Right or wrong?
Wrong, if it was the government that passed the regulation. Right if it
was a community association that WalMart had to buy into, or go to a
different community association with different rules.
All sorts of restrictions that are justifiable when imposed by contract,
where parties freely agreed, and have a market to choose from, are
unjust when imposed by majority rule.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
| Whew. Where to start? (...) It is legislating consensual behaviour. And that's wrong. No avoiding it. (...) True. So what? (...) First off, why does government have a monopoly on sanctioning marriages? Aren't they merely a contract between people? (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
