Subject:
|
Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Dec 2001 09:32:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1697 times
|
| |
|
|
Curt wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> > In lugnet.mediawatch, Curt Tigges writes:
> > > I am shocked and disgusted at anyone who would be immoral and low enough to
> > > display these films on the Internet. Even though I have not watched them, I
> > > have learned enough reading this thread. It is not right for anyone to
> > > display this trash anywhere. Legos were not meant to be used in digital
> > > films filled with smut, they were meant for enhancing creativity through
> > > building and designing. I hope nobody flames me for this, but if they do, I
> > > will still stand by my opinions.
> >
> > I mean, after all, back in the
> > 50's (or so) bikinis were indecent. Way back in the 20's, showing your
> > calves (or was it knees?) in public was a disgrace. Supposedly there's blue
> > laws in Boston about how couples may not hold hands in Boston Common
>
> No matter what the standards of reavealing parts of one's body, depictions
> of LEGO minifigs being gay and doing you-know-what-else is evil and immoral.
Ummm, only if you believe being gay is immoral. Luckily for gay people, I and
enough other people don't believe that (or at the least don't worry about it
enough to persecute gay people).
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
