To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14645
14644  |  14646
Subject: 
Re: The Nam-shub of Enki (was Re: One of my issues with the god of the old testament)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 17:15:14 GMT
Viewed: 
1734 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
>  Many Christians with whom I've discussed this matter usually fall back on
> either "God has His reasons" or "It's for your own good, like it or not,"
> and your suggestion re: oncoming train put me in mind of those other
> arguments.

Ah, then you fell for the misleading opening comments -- if you get to the
end, it's all about how there is no god.  Instead, there is just a story to
describe a human experience that may have to do with evolution.

> More important, did you receive my last email about your MOC?  I have a
> sense that Excite Mail isn't as reliable a provider as I might like...

Nope, which sucks.  Try writing to me at burningchrome@juno.com, I don't
check it as frequently but it seems to be more reliable than AO-Hell.

Already the many bricks comprising Castle Blacktron overload my 'puter,
CAD-wise...meanwhile I am trying a more modular approach.

-- Hop-Frog



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Nam-shub of Enki (was Re: One of my issues with the god of the old testament)
 
(...) Well, that's just not inflammatory enough for me! (...) I'll try re-sending the reply just to verify that we're able to communicate. I didn't offer any great insights, but I don't want you to think I'm snubbing you, either. (...) Ah, I recall (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Nam-shub of Enki (was Re: One of my issues with the god of the old testament)
 
(...) Post? What post? Actually, I was responding not to your post directly but to a point that resonated from what you wrote. To that end, I should have been more specific in identifying that your point was not really what I was addressing, and I (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

117 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR