To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14395
14394  |  14396
Subject: 
Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 02:19:03 GMT
Viewed: 
2869 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> > Ross Crawford wrote:
> > 
> > > > This is an interesting point. It is a generaisation, but in the UK low
> > > > income families tend to have more kids than higher earners. Many couples
> > > > (married or otherwsie) decide to have only one or no kids at all. If we
> > > > assume (again a generisation) that low income familes have lower levels of
> > > > intelligence (measured by lower levels of educational attainment) is our
> > > > gene pool geing skewed the wrong way?
> > > 
> > > Is there a "wrong way"?
> > 
> > I would think that most people with at least middling intelligence would tend • to
> > agree that decreasing the overall intelligence level of our species is the • "wrong
> > way".
> 
> That may be so, but I would think that most people who have a middling
> understanding of evolution would agree that intelligence has little (if any)
> effect on it.

Except to stop it. Which we are in the process of doing, and which was my
original point!

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
 
(...) of (...) tend (...) We may, in the end, cause our own extinction, in which case I guess you could say we're currently in the process of stopping our evolution, but I think it's a pretty big stretch. As I've said before, I think humanity will (...) (25 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
 
(...) to (...) "wrong (...) That may be so, but I would think that most people who have a middling understanding of evolution would agree that intelligence has little (if any) effect on it. (...) right (...) No. Read the question again. I was (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR