To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14395
14394  |  14396
Subject: 
Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 02:19:03 GMT
Viewed: 
836 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
Ross Crawford wrote:

This is an interesting point. It is a generaisation, but in the UK low
income families tend to have more kids than higher earners. Many couples
(married or otherwsie) decide to have only one or no kids at all. If we
assume (again a generisation) that low income familes have lower levels of
intelligence (measured by lower levels of educational attainment) is our
gene pool geing skewed the wrong way?

Is there a "wrong way"?

I would think that most people with at least middling intelligence would tend • to
agree that decreasing the overall intelligence level of our species is the • "wrong
way".

That may be so, but I would think that most people who have a middling
understanding of evolution would agree that intelligence has little (if any)
effect on it.

Except to stop it. Which we are in the process of doing, and which was my
original point!

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
 
(...) of (...) tend (...) We may, in the end, cause our own extinction, in which case I guess you could say we're currently in the process of stopping our evolution, but I think it's a pretty big stretch. As I've said before, I think humanity will (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
 
(...) to (...) "wrong (...) That may be so, but I would think that most people who have a middling understanding of evolution would agree that intelligence has little (if any) effect on it. (...) right (...) No. Read the question again. I was (...) (23 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR