Subject:
|
Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:31:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
649 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Horst Lehner writes:
> So, being asked for a proof of identity violates one of your rights? Which
> one?
Right to privacy. Right against unreasonable search and seizure....
Absent of being suspected of a specific crime there is no constitutional
requirement to say who in particular you are if you are in a public place.
Certainly private property owners can impose whatever restrictions on their
property use they wish, including the presentment of satisfactory ID, but
public property is not private, and the government can impose no such and
still remain constitutional.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) Is it, therefore, unconstitutional that the government require ID checks prior to allowing admission into CDC labs, for instance? These are government property, ie: public property, are they not? Dave! (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) So, being asked for a proof of identity violates one of your rights? Which one? I would be opposed to any other than a very brief use of my ID information, but giving it out to briefly check whether I am on a list of wanted people seems OK (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
173 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
