Subject:
|
Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:34:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
481 times
|
| |
|
|
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> No time to dig into this in depth but I should point out that I have, in
> this very group, already taken the stance that *both* bombings were necessary.
<snipped>
That being said, it is reasonable to conclude that you have nothing new to
contribute to this discussion and anyone interested in your opinions can
check your previous posts. Thanks for pointing that out to us, I'm sure
anyone interested in what you have to say will take the time to read your
previous posts. Hopefully that will save you the need of repeating yourself
or listening to what others have to say on this issue. And thank you for
sharing your skepticism regarding the link I posted, hopefully other people
will view it with the same intent to not change their paradigm. I hope I've
been clear on this matter.
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
| (...) No time to dig into this in depth but I should point out that I have, in this very group, already taken the stance that *both* bombings were necessary. I spent a little time at that site late last nite (early this morning, actually). The (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
