To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13977
13976  |  13978
Subject: 
Re: A N T H R A X - they aren't making this stuff in caves in Afghanistan
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:21:41 GMT
Viewed: 
2607 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > (citing the Guardian)
> > > ==+==
> > > In May 1989, large-scale anthrax production began at a factory constructed
> > > at Al Hakam. Unscom estimated that Al Hakam manufactured 8,425 litres of
> > > anthrax bacteria during the course of 1990.
> > > ==+==
> > 
> > Thanks for the cite. Does anyone know if this stuff keeps for 10 years in
> > powder form? Bacteria are quite resilient but 10 years is an aw'fly long time.
> 
>   The powder isn't bacteria.  The powder is *spores*.  And spores
>   keep a long, long, long time--live spores nearly 8,000 years old
>   have been pulled from ice cores in the last decade or so.

8000 Years! Pah, that is nothing compared to 250,000,000 years:
http://inq.philly.com/content/inquirer/2000/10/19/front_page/ANCIENT19.htm

Scott A

> 
> > (of course that cite just shows production capability, it could still be in
> > production, or Iraq could be totally innocent of this particular perfidy and
> > the site destroyed or out of production for years. Who knows?)
> 
>   Apparently it's possible to get small amounts of this stuff
>   from supply companies in the US.  You'd need a way to make more,
>   sure, but with bin Laden's deep pockets it's possible.
> 
>   Then again, it *could* be left over.  Or it could be an opportunistic
>   attack from an antigovernment group here in the USA.
> 
> > What I think is telling is the price/performance ratio here. For the cost of
> > a stamp and a little legwork (ignoring production cost), an entire country
> > is stirred up and tens or hundreds of millions spent on defense. Highly
> > asymmetrical, highly efficient of scarce terrorist resources.
> 
>   ...and it undermines public confidence in a major public industry.
>   A government public industry.  What's worse, the powder from one
>   of those letters, if it's leaking out through the seams as it's
>   been said to do, could be spread around on *hundreds* or *thousands*
>   of pieces of mail.  Aiiiee.  Let the US Government do your distribution
>   for you.
> 
>   IMHO, this is the hallmark of this entire terror campaign--to use
>   our institutions, our technologies, our fears, and our freedoms
>   against us.  It's brilliant, but I'm convinced that they've really
>   underestimated the power of our commitment to our ideals.
> 
> > Evil != stupid
> 
>   Alas, true evil rarely is.  Were only bin Laden that dumb guy
>   who leaves his wallet at the gas station he's just robbed...sigh.
> 
>   best
> 
>   LFB



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A N T H R A X - they aren't making this stuff in caves in Afghanistan
 
(...) The powder isn't bacteria. The powder is *spores*. And spores keep a long, long, long time--live spores nearly 8,000 years old have been pulled from ice cores in the last decade or so. (...) Apparently it's possible to get small amounts of (...) (25 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

117 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR