Subject:
|
Re: More on Palestine
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:08:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
511 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:
> Even regardless of the innocent people who get killed, who have nothing to
> do with nothing? Goals, shmoals, the bottom line is there used to be such a
> thing as chivalry. The movie "The Patriot" pointed that out and it is as
> true then as it is now. The "anything goes in war" mentality applies to
> terrorists and cowards. It is very easy to kill defenseless women and
> children, there's no bravery, heroism, patriotism or honor in that. If
> anyone thinks there is, I suggest they talk to a Vietnam vet sometime.
I have spoken to a Vietnam Vet; last night in fact; I have a special word for
him; I call him Dad. And you know what? Dad *never* killed defenseless women
and children in Vietnam. I take extreme umbrage with your statement. That was
a horrible war, but fought honorably and bravely by the vast majority of
Americans (and others - my dad has never been an American citizen, but fought
for the U.S. Army) who went to Hell out of no choice of their own. I find it
insulting to the hundreds of thousands of honorable Vietnam servicemen still
with us. Perhaps *you* should talk to some Vietnam Vets and/or the families of
the killed, maimed or missing before you dishonor their sacrifices.
james
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: More on Palestine
|
| (...) What?!!! You're taking my statement completely the wrong way, pal! Show me where I insulted any Vietnam vet?! I'm PRAISING the fact that many, many Vietnem vets knew something about chivalry. They detested the fact that they were put in the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: More on Palestine
|
| (...) Two articles I recall off the top of my head, one in "Time" and one in "Newsweek," as well as a lengthy documentary on the History Channel. On the web, here's a historian who has done extensive research on the matter. You actually have to take (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
117 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|