Subject:
|
Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 07:50:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
821 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > What about the "evidence" the USA had when it bombed Sudan?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm not convinced that we didn't get snookered on that, and that it >>>>>>>>wasn't
> > > > > > > > > actually his plant after all.
>
> > > So "not being convinced" is satisfied as far as I am concerned. I have
> > > lingering doubts. That's it.
> > >
> > > Note that I never said "I am sure we DID get taken on this". If you could
> > > actually read for comprehension you would have figured this out from the
> > > first. But you have more fun bludgeoning than paying attention, I guess.
>
> > Nothing tangible then?
>
> I reminded readers it was a hunch, then gave my justification for my hunch,
> but you are still not satisfied.
>
> Whatever.
>
> Are we going to replay the statistics/hunch argument again but with even
> less basis? You have more fun bludgeoning than thinking, I guess.
The fact is Larry a lot of people died because of that action. I have seen
so credible report which supports it. But still you pour cold water on it,
but yet you are willing to accept the word of a politician on similar issues.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered
|
| (...) I reminded readers it was a hunch, then gave my justification for my hunch, but you are still not satisfied. Whatever. Are we going to replay the statistics/hunch argument again but with even less basis? You have more fun bludgeoning than (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|