To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13777
13776  |  13778
Subject: 
Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 07:50:08 GMT
Viewed: 
2576 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > What about the "evidence" the USA had when it bombed Sudan?
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > I'm not convinced that we didn't get snookered on that, and that it >>>>>>>>wasn't
> > > > > > > > > actually his plant after all.
> 
> > > So "not being convinced" is satisfied as far as I am concerned. I have
> > > lingering doubts. That's it.
> > > 
> > > Note that I never said "I am sure we DID get taken on this". If you could
> > > actually read for comprehension you would have figured this out from the
> > > first. But you have more fun bludgeoning than paying attention, I guess.
> 
> > Nothing tangible then?
> 
> I reminded readers it was a hunch, then gave my justification for my hunch,
> but you are still not satisfied.
> 
> Whatever.
> 
> Are we going to replay the statistics/hunch argument again but with even
> less basis?  You have more fun bludgeoning than thinking, I guess.

The fact is Larry a lot of people died because of that action. I have seen
so credible report which supports it. But still you pour cold water on it,
but yet you are willing to accept the word of a politician on similar issues.

Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered
 
(...) I reminded readers it was a hunch, then gave my justification for my hunch, but you are still not satisfied. Whatever. Are we going to replay the statistics/hunch argument again but with even less basis? You have more fun bludgeoning than (...) (25 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR