Subject:
|
Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 21:05:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
819 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
(snipped)
> Larry
>
> Debating skill: 9
> Cluelessness: 2
> Stubbornness: 6
> Openness: 7
> Humility: 2
> Annoying: 6
>
> Notes:
> Larry seems to usually have a good grip on what his position is, and is able
> to back up his point sufficiently well. When he doesn't have a firm grip on
> his position, he's occasionally been known to fluctuate, and typically
> doesn't back his position up well-- only because these times are when basic
> philosophic principles are at stake. The bonus to Larry is that he is fairly
> open to changing his mind-- it just doesn't happen much if at all.
>
> The largest fault of Larry's is probably his occasionally quick-to-judge
> attitude towards points he feels he's already addressed. Sometimes Scott
> (for example) will have a perfectly valid point and Larry will gloss over it
> calling it a non-issue without giving it a 2nd thought. It doesn't happen
> often, but it happens.
>
> He's also got an ego. He treads on ground confident that he's done the best
> possible job of defending it that there can ever be, which often isn't the
> case. However, he does have reason to think so. As far as debating goes,
> there aren't many who can get Larry to the itchy point. Most of his
> convictions stand firm and can be well backed up.
>
> ------------------
>
> Scott
>
> Debating skill: 4
> Cluelessness: 3
> Stubbornness: 9
> Openness: 4
> Humility: 5
> Annoying: 8
>
> Notes:
> Scott's generally got some work to do on debating form. This is quite
> possibly his largest issue. He seems to take o-t-debate as a very fast-paced
> forum, paying little time towards each reply. Replies are often quickly put
> out, with little organization or thought involved. They do not seem to
> follow the general debating format wherein one would state one's
> assumptions, the problems with the proposed theory, then propose a new
> theory, admitting any weaknesses it had.
>
> But don't assume too quickly. Scott often has a point, even though it's not
> stated well. It's merely that he doesn't put the time/effort into voicing
> it. When forced (upon occasion), Scott has proven that he is fully capable
> of being less clueless, more open, and more insightful.
>
> He also suffers from stubbornness. He doesn't let an issue drop very easily,
> and often prods and prods and prods until a response is given. Further, when
> cornered, he doesn't like admitting his faults. The one upshot to Scott over
> Larry is that Scott is typically less assuming of his own position being
> "right". You'll seldom hear Scott defending his own stance, and more often
> hear him attacking others'.
(snipped)
ROTFL!
They were almost reduced to the status of "Pokemon" playing cards!
Anyway, I do not know these two guys long enough to make such a deep
analysis of their debating skills, so I won't. However, I partially agree
with you due to what I have been offered to see in the last six months.
To *those two*: Peace and Love, dudes! Chill out, you are not THAT different...
;-)
Pedro
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered
|
| (...) You do not know the temptation I resisted in heading that post with something along the lines of "Brand new O-T-Debator cards! Collect them all! Trade 'em with your friends! Or compete head-to-head on your own non-Lego topics! Coming soon, how (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered
|
| (...) I doubt most o-t-debators would choose seriously from any of the above options other than the 3rd, though maybe that's just me. I can't see actually wanting to ban either of you based on your previous content. A poll to the first set of (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
