 | | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) The argument has been made in the past that having .debate as a place to send off topic debates is good for the rest of LUGNET. If you want to discuss LEGO, do so. Nothing is stopping you, nothing is making you post here, and posts here do not (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Hear, hear! Bionicle has very little to do with LEGO, but it's granted its own on-topic posting group. OT.Debate need not be read by anyone not wishing to do so. Dave! (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered —Lawrence Wilkes
|
| | | | | "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GL00zG.IEF@lugnet.com... (...) Lighten up. I should have put a smiley on it Oh, and my vote is no one should be banned. No one forces anyone to read or reply to what is posted here. (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes, and once you add annoying twits to your Kill filter, this group is a much nicer read. I've had a much nicer time in this group since adding someone to my Kill filter last week. (...) Unfortunately, the "entertainment" often sinks to the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Ignorance is bliss. :) Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 11-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Doubt he'll see that. Or this. I think we *both* made his kill file. (23 years ago, 11-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Did I ever tell you a little story I heard about Tom? It goes like this ... :) Scott A (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) This not true Larry. Where did I say that? I rejected the whole foolish notion - not its outcome. If I did take part, I would "abide by such an outcome". But I am not, so this is not an issue. Perhaps you could run alone: Vote 1) Larry Stays (...) (23 years ago, 11-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | What, no answer? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) What, no answer? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
