 | | "White man's club":...another smear by Scott —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Any such implication was unintentional and is hereby disclaimed. :-) ++Lar (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: "White man's club":...another smear by Scott —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) For the record, I quoted your post as I remembered it as being a good summation of the argument, and I still think it is. So what was it then? An accurate representation? (...) OK. Larry, I shall retract my comment if you can show us that the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | A challenge to Larry which he will huff and puff about but ultimately not answer – (nothing new real —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | I forgot to change the title (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "White man's club":...another smear by Scott —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I don't deny demographics. Never did. I deny relevance to message. (...) How convenient, you set the question up so you get to keep using your smear. The term is pejorative and you know it. (...) In fact it does. You are smearing by using the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "White man's club":...another smear by Scott —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Than you are in denial of reality (in my opinion). (...) That depends on the sense you imply. Do you prefer "overwhelmingly & disproportionately white man's club"? (...) Nope. Your post was a correction for dave. It had nothing to do with me. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
