To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13563
13562  |  13564
Subject: 
Re: PA censoring journalists again, but repudiating bin Laden...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:38:13 GMT
Viewed: 
330 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
<snipped>

It's all one big, ugly mess. However, it comes as no surprise to me that
some Palestinians, after years of American supported Israeli occupation and
brutality, would praise Bin Laden. It would be different if America WAS
actually innocent of supporting Israel, then those Palestinians praising Bin
Laden would be way out of line. But of course that's not the case; America
IS supporting the Israeli occupation hence it's only fair if Palestinians
resent America.

Come now Dan. If OBL did do this. And some Palestinians do support him. I
think saying some Palestinians *resent* America is putting it lightly.

So the big question is: Why are we supporting Israel? If
America really values freedom and human rights, why do we support
Israel--world leader in human rights violations, oppressor of people in the
name of their religion, every bit a dirty dog as the Taliban?

Israel is bad Dan. Israel is very bad. They are not quite as bad as the
Taliban. Although it is amazing, Sharon has been elected. *His* people can
remove him without bloodshed.

I have got mixed views on why the USA supports Israel. Why do you think it
is so?

Scott A



But much of the rest of the article discusses how the PA is repudiating bin
Laden support:

``It's true that there is an unfair situation and continuous crimes and
killings exerted against the Palestinians,'' he said. ``This does not
justify or give cover for anyone to kill or terrorize innocent civilians.''
- PA info minister Rabbo

Bravo for those words, I say.

Indeed. I think the best course of action to ensure lasting peace is to not
to jump in bed with filthy dogs since all we get is more fleas.

Dan



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: PA censoring journalists again, but repudiating bin Laden...
 
(...) Really? I'd say a bunch of foreigners invading, terrorizing and running out the native population in the name of religion is pretty bad. Bulldozing those people's homes--pretty bad. Mortar attacks, helicopter gunship attacks, cluster bombs, (...) (23 years ago, 8-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: PA censoring journalists again, but repudiating bin Laden...
 
Hello Scott, (...) Because there are many Jews in the US, and because they have over-average positions with influence? Can it be as simple as that? Greetings Horst (23 years ago, 8-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: PA censoring journalists again, but repudiating bin Laden...
 
(...) <snipped> It's all one big, ugly mess. However, it comes as no surprise to me that some Palestinians, after years of American supported Israeli occupation and brutality, would praise Bin Laden. It would be different if America WAS actually (...) (23 years ago, 8-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

117 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR