To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13457
13456  |  13458
Subject: 
Re: War
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 5 Oct 2001 16:28:56 GMT
Viewed: 
3006 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > I'll reiterate, FB Jr.s pain is FB Srs fault more than anyone else's.
> > 
> > Acha! That's the crucial bit. "More FBS's fault than the government's". I.E.
> > not to say that the government isn't at fault-- that would be (I think it
> > is)misleading. But more to say that it is FBS's actions which, "should" have
> > changed-- or "should" have changed *more* than the government's actions
> > "should" have changed.
> > 
> > > Reread the cite I gave... you're going down the same complex causality road
> > > that they were.
> > 
> > And more so! By Chaos theory *I'm* actually at fault! But so much less so
> > than others that bringing me into the picture would be nearly useless.
> > However, to state that the US is not at fault at *all* is misleading and
> > incorrect, would say I.
> 
> What I want to do is divorce causality from fault to a certain extent here.
> Factors in FB Sr.s environment may well have contributed to his being a bad
> person, ("caused it") but remember the scenario, we assume a just finding of
> homicide as a basis. (not manslaughter, not "not guilty by reason of
> insanity") That means he DECIDED to murder.
> 
> This means *by definition* that the fault here lies with the person who
> voluntarily committed the crime. Not the state for restricting his further
> ability to commit crimes (and punish him at the same time), not the nebulous
> factors that made him be a bad person. He CHOSE to be bad in this particular
> instance so it's *all* his fault. Regardless of secondary causality.
> 
> > I think your point is not that the US isn't at fault, but that it is not the
> > US's actions that should change
> 
> Wow I must have really explained this badly. (I don't actually think so of
> course)... that's wrong twice.
> 
> My point rather is totally opposite. The US OUGHT to drop the sanctions. The
> US OUGHT to change how it meddles so as not to create further Husseins. The
> US OUGHT to clean up the mess it made here, which means getting rid of this
> particular tinpot and doing some nation building, distasteful as that is to
> me in the general case.
> 
> But the US ought to do these things for reasons OTHER than that the US is at
> any way at fault for what (if anything) the sanctions did or did not do.
> 
> (note carefully we are talking about fault as far as sanction effects and
> sanction effects only. That Hussein is able to do what he has done in the
> last 10 years IS our fault, but it's not the sanctions, it is fault due to
> actions we took (propping him up for meddlesome reasons) or didn't take (not
> removing him when it would have been easier to do so than now) farther back
> in time that clearly have culpability)
> 
> The fence builder is not at fault for building fences if bandits cut
> themselves on the barbs.

What if passers by cut themselves on the barbs?


> 
> The punisher is not at fault for punishing criminals if the criminals suffer.

...only if the punishment is just.

Scott A

> 
> Cause != fault
> 
> ++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: War
 
(...) That's easy. Either the fence builder built a hazardous obstruction on land not his own, or the passer by was trespassing. (...) There's no such thing. The punisher is at fault, in my opinon (but it can only _be_ opinion...there is no right (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: War
 
(...) What I want to do is divorce causality from fault to a certain extent here. Factors in FB Sr.s environment may well have contributed to his being a bad person, ("caused it") but remember the scenario, we assume a just finding of homicide as a (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

177 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR