| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > Nope. That cite in fact does get to the root of the assertion you make.
> > Saying that FB Sr. has an out because he had a bad childhood is egregious
> > bogosity.
>
> An "out"? I never said he had an "out". An "out" implies removal of
> responsibility perhaps, but not of fault.
Can you elaborate on what you mean by "fault !=bad" then? Maybe there's some
fundamental misunderstanding here...
However:
I'll reiterate, FB Jr.s pain is FB Srs fault more than anyone else's. Reread
the cite I gave... you're going down the same complex causality road that
they were.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: War
|
| (...) Acha! That's the crucial bit. "More FBS's fault than the government's". I.E. not to say that the government isn't at fault-- that would be (I think it is)misleading. But more to say that it is FBS's actions which, "should" have changed-- or (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: War
|
| (...) An "out"? I never said he had an "out". An "out" implies removal of responsibility perhaps, but not of fault. Perhaps a re-reading of my two posts is in order. I feel a little like I'm entering the "Scott-and-Larry show" on this one... DaveE (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
177 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
