Subject:
|
Re: Thank you, Britain.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 18:17:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
536 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> >
> > > Most have yet to see any evidence (assuming it exists).
> >
> > I addressed that in another post (it is deep in the "War" war). Lord
> > Robertson is either fooled by faked evidence, in on the gag, or the evidence
> > does actualy exist.
>
> Well, that's good enough for me... lets bomb them! (not).
Thanks for the snide comment but which of those three choices were you going
with? Calling him a failed politician isn't an answer either. Pick one of
the above or show that I omitted one possibility and let me know what it is?
> What about the "evidence" NATO had when it bombed the Chinese embassy?
This was faulty targeting information, that's way different than crime
evidence, wouldn't you say? I agree it was certainly naff though. Not relevant.
> What about the "evidence" the USA had when it bombed Sudan?
I'm not convinced that we didn't get snookered on that, and that it wasn't
actually his plant after all. But please provide a cite where I said I
supported that bombing (or any other bombing by the US for that matter), if
you would...
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Thank you, Britain.
|
| (...) Why not? (...) The fact that the evidence which is been presented is all circumstantial, very simplistic in nature and collected by agencies who have failed in the past. When I read the evidence, I have to ask myself why the USA was not on a (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Thank you, Britain.
|
| (...) Well, that's good enough for me... lets bomb them! (not). What about the "evidence" NATO had when it bombed the Chinese embassy? Was it not duff? What about the "evidence" the USA had when it bombed Sudan? Was it not duff? See: (URL) A (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
