 | | Re: Who are we to judge? —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Stanley writes: But in the context of the rest of the speech Bush made I think it (...) Well, here's where we get into how slippery and essentially empty the president's rhetoric really is... Nations are not things (...) (23 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Who are we to judge? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) I don't often point out arrogance in others as I've very aware that I sometimes exhibit more than my own share of it. Not sure if you're pegging me as one of these sheep, although if you are I guess it doesn't bother me much, as I don't need (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who are we to judge? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) Lindsay Braun at an absolute minimum... (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Who are we to judge? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) Not tenured, adjunct at best. All of our dignity has been thoroughly crushed. :D (Wait, why the heck am I grinning about that?!?) John Ladasky too, but he doesn't poke into .debate AFAIK. best LFB (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Who are we to judge? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) And Bricksmith Brian Stokes too. ((URL) I dunno if he's a full prof or just an instructor or what. He, wisely, stays out of .debate as well. It's kind of like a cross between a drug addiction and the sick pleasure some get in watching a train (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who are we to judge? —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) Sorry, I calls them as I sees them. And if anything, I was trying to antagonize people into being anything BUT political sheep. You should do as pleases you. But I wasn't attacking you for anything more than defending the words of a man I (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who are we to judge? —Dave Low
|
| | | | (...) I think Mike's comments here demonstrate a vital tension in Western society, and possibly all societies. One of the defining attributes of social living is task specialisation: farmers, soldiers, leaders. An individual can have many strings to (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who are we to judge? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | You know, sometimes the mistaken reading is much funnier than the accurate one. (...) I had initially expected to see the asterisk after "skin a cat." My immediate response was "well, yes, but why would you *want* to?" ack, LFB (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
