To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 12048
12047  |  12049
Subject: 
Re: National vote on handguns?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 22:19:17 GMT
Viewed: 
2890 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Trobaugh writes:
> 
> > Well Bruce, I'll let you in on the fact that I worked for the Fulton County
> > Sheriff's department for 4 years, and was well trained on how to use my
> > firearm. Also I was very aware of what intruders can do when they break into
> > a person's home, I've seen the results in person. So believe me when I say
> > any one who breaks into someone's home is considered a dangerous threat, and
> > should be treated as such.
> 
> 
> Yes, and you get to shoot those kind of people.  I wasn't arguing that.
> Just blasting away is on dangerous legal grounds is what I was talking
> about.  Odds are you can get away with it.  Odds are you were right.  But
> there are enough dead innocent people out there to prove my point.


So then what were you arguing? You've just confused me. Where is the
distinction?

> My grandfather, with 20 years on the LAPD and about 20 more as a Special
> Investigator for the State of California was my source, by the way.
> 
> Bruce



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: National vote on handguns?
 
(...) Just re-read the previous post. And the light came on, if a little late. Yes, whacking an intruder may put me in the legal spotlight. Yes, I may have broken other laws in the process (1). I'm willing to take that risk if it means that my (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: National vote on handguns?
 
(...) Yes, and you get to shoot those kind of people. I wasn't arguing that. Just blasting away is on dangerous legal grounds is what I was talking about. Odds are you can get away with it. Odds are you were right. But there are enough dead innocent (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

110 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR