Subject:
|
Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:30:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
601 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > Do you think the could conciev how powerful democarcy would come. How
> > everyone (more or less) would be able to vote? Or do you think they had
> > events like the French revolution in mind?
>
> This one is so riddled with typos I can't make it out. Would you please
> repeat the question, this time carefully checking for correctness? Thanks.
Scott,
Just so you know that Larry's not just being rude because of
your...special...relationship, I have no idea what you're saying either. I
think that I've put the words individually all back together, but I still just
don't know what you mean by the first sentence in particular.
Are you talking about the rise of 'powerful democracy' or the innate power of
democracy, or something else? I do assume they understood that everyone could
vote...unless I am again failing to get your drift.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) Do you think they really could understand how it could work out? How modern media makes politicians almost instantly accountable? How in transparent systems, like the UK, those funding politicians would be dragged out into the open? You will (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) This one is so riddled with typos I can't make it out. Would you please repeat the question, this time carefully checking for correctness? Thanks. (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
182 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|