Subject:
|
Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:39:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
343 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> Interesting. So what is your take on this:
> http://www.chron.com/content/chronicle/nation/guns/part4/constitution.html
What do you mean? It's a news piece that accurately describes the state of our
judiciary's stance. I don't have any problem with the reporter's work, if
that's what you mean. I think that the court has been cowardly in not
embracing the obviously correct meaning of the second amendment. I suspect
that they wish not to encourage personal violence and thus stand scared and
innactive instead of doing their job in this case.
What's your take on it?
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
182 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
