Subject:
|
Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 08:20:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
480 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
>
> > It depends on the state.
>
> Which is a violation of the constitution.
I wondered about this too. Do laws really vary that much state-by-state?
Just wondering.
Scott A
>
> > Some require training (or will require it soon)
>
> Which is a violation of the constitution.
>
> > order to own a handgun (but not a rifle or shotgun - how stupid is that? It
> > should be training for all, or no training for all).
>
> It should be training for none.
>
> Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) Yes. And that's a good thing. The way it's supposed to work is that our states are almost individual nations. loosely federated for the purpose of administration and holding to constitutional edicts. The fact that states (and the federal (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
182 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
